0
3.0

关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过

导演:
居伊·德波
主演:
未知
别名:
未知
3.0
0人评分
法语
语言
未知
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:
Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�  Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept  Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
猜你喜欢
换一换
0
2.0
HD中字
不要抬头
2.0
上映时间:10月02日 16:35
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,詹妮弗·劳伦斯,梅丽尔·斯特里普,凯特·布兰切特,罗布·摩根,乔纳·希尔,马克·里朗斯,泰勒·派瑞,提莫西·查拉梅,朗·普尔曼,爱莉安娜·格兰德,卡迪小子,克里斯·埃文斯,希米什·帕特尔,梅兰妮·林斯基,迈克尔·切克利斯,托莫·希思黎,保罗·吉尔福伊尔,罗伯特·乔伊,海缇安·朴,朗尼·法默,罗斯·帕特里奇,列维·施瑞博尔,克里斯·埃弗里特,乔治亚·莱曼,帕特丽夏·德哈尼,本·锡德尔,特蕾莎·普雷恩,梅根·莱瑟斯,阿什利·班菲尔德,萨拉·西尔弗曼,乔·格拉瑟,博·艾伦,塞莱斯特·奥利瓦
简介:

  天文学研究生凯特(詹妮弗·劳伦斯 Jennifer Lawrence 饰)和她的导师兰道尔博士(莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥 Leonardo DiCaprio 饰)在一次研究中震惊的发现,一颗像喜马拉雅山那么大的彗星正在全速向地球靠近,不出意外的话,6个月之后,这颗彗星会抵达地球,将这里的一切都毁灭。
  凯特和兰道尔找到了美国总统奥尔良(梅丽尔·斯特里普 Meryl Streep 饰),希望她能够重视此事,可是,他们得到的却是嘲笑和蔑视。之后,师徒两人转而向媒体求助,决定跳过政府,直接向民众揭露这个秘密,效果当然也不尽如人意,不仅如此,凯特还因为泄露了国家机密而遭到了FBI的逮捕。当奥尔良总统深陷艳照丑闻中之时,她终于想到了这两个可怜的科学家,于是,她决定再给他们一次机会,借由政府之口将地球将要毁灭的消息昭告天下。

0
HD中字
不要抬头
主演:莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥,詹妮弗·劳伦斯,梅丽尔·斯特里普,凯特·布兰切特,罗布·摩根,乔纳·希尔,马克·里朗斯,泰勒·派瑞,提莫西·查拉梅,朗·普尔曼,爱莉安娜·格兰德,卡迪小子,克里斯·埃文斯,希米什·帕特尔,梅兰妮·林斯基,迈克尔·切克利斯,托莫·希思黎,保罗·吉尔福伊尔,罗伯特·乔伊,海缇安·朴,朗尼·法默,罗斯·帕特里奇,列维·施瑞博尔,克里斯·埃弗里特,乔治亚·莱曼,帕特丽夏·德哈尼,本·锡德尔,特蕾莎·普雷恩,梅根·莱瑟斯,阿什利·班菲尔德,萨拉·西尔弗曼,乔·格拉瑟,博·艾伦,塞莱斯特·奥利瓦
0
8.0
HD中字
神秘博士博士之力
8.0
上映时间:10月02日 16:37
主演:朱迪·惠特克,大卫·布拉德利,大卫·田纳特,彼得·戴维森,科林·贝克,西尔维斯特·迈可伊,保罗·麦甘恩,苏菲·阿尔德雷德,珍妮特·菲尔丁,凯蒂·曼宁,威廉·拉塞尔,乔·玛蒂娜,曼迪·吉尔,萨沙·达万,约翰·毕晓普,吉玛·雷德格里夫,雅各布·安德森,布莱德利·沃尔什,西拉斯·卡森
简介:

  经历了许多危险的旅程,在时空中与最可怕的怪物对决后,第十三任博士终于迎来了她最后的冒险,对抗她最致命的敌人: 戴立克、赛博人和她的宿敌——法师。
  是谁在一个遥远的星系边缘攻击一辆高速行驶的列车?为什么地震学家从21世纪的地球上纷纷消失?那些失踪的世界名画究竟下落何在?为什么一个戴立克要主动和博士联系?在1916年的俄罗斯,妖僧拉斯普廷和沙皇尼古拉斯之间究竟发生了什么不为人知的故事?一重重威胁在博士面前展现,面对这场生死之战,她将何去何从……

0
HD中字
神秘博士博士之力
主演:朱迪·惠特克,大卫·布拉德利,大卫·田纳特,彼得·戴维森,科林·贝克,西尔维斯特·迈可伊,保罗·麦甘恩,苏菲·阿尔德雷德,珍妮特·菲尔丁,凯蒂·曼宁,威廉·拉塞尔,乔·玛蒂娜,曼迪·吉尔,萨沙·达万,约翰·毕晓普,吉玛·雷德格里夫,雅各布·安德森,布莱德利·沃尔什,西拉斯·卡森
统计代码